Faustian Bargains

The current dead heat—at least within the margin of error—between Trump and Harris three weeks before election day continues to amaze me: how half of America wants this man to be president—again—is simply shocking. I totally agree with a statement I have seen only once but deserves far wider attention. Roughly, it goes like this: “If you’ve ever wondered what beliefs you might have had or stance you might have taken as a German citizen during Hitler’s rise in Germany in the 30s, just ask yourself what beliefs about American politics you have now, and what political stance you have taken, and that will be your answer.” No doubt that comparison offends Trump supporters—well, at least all those except the neo-Nazis, Proud Boys, Oath Keepers, and all their ilk. But I think the statement is true, a valid comparison. Trump is fascistic, a would-be dictator, an unambiguous threat to democracy even by his own words. But still half the country wants him back. For some he is the Messiah; for others (mainly Republican politicians) he is the popular wave they ride either because they adore him or because they fear his bullying and the possible end of their political careers; for still others he is the plutocrat who will ensure further tax breaks, especially for the top ten percent; and for the masses he is the deified strongman who will install one-party, one-religion rule, eliminate their grievances and fears, and destroy all the conjured enemies within, namely the entire Democratic party along with most of those who are not what those ‘30s-era Germans called “Aryan.”

These Faustian bargains, like all Faustian bargains, have a cost, usually promising some grand and rarefied gift in exchange for one’s morality, character, or soul. In exchange for a Trump victory, the articles of the contract required of the Trump voter include:

An embrace of obvious, continuous, and egregious lying as a new norm, as a poisoned way of life in American politics

An acceptance of a level of public vulgarity never previously seen by a presidential candidate

A willingness to turn the country over to a narcissistic would-be dictator willing to “suspend” the Constitution whenever it advantages him to do so

An acceptance of Vladimir Putin’s view of the world, including the killing of domestic opponents

Acquiescence to a foreign dictator invading a neighboring democratic country in Europe and claiming it as his own, coupled with disinterest in the resulting suffering and deaths of tens of thousands of innocent victims

Satisfaction with the U. S. military hunting American citizens who Trump considers enemies

Satisfaction with the U. S. military being used to shoot peacefully protesting American citizens “in the legs”

A willingness to have internment camps set up in the U. S. for American citizens Trump considers “enemies of the people” (a Stalin phrase)

Satisfaction with Trump’s desire to revoke the licenses of media outlets such as CBS and ABC for running stories offensive to him, directly opposing the first amendment

An embrace of a con man who, while running for president, is peddling golden shoes, a Trump $100,000 watch, and, shamelessly, Trump Bibles

An endorsement of Trump’s dangling the possibility of having members of the military he doesn’t like hanged for treason

A willingness to pay a family average of $2600 per year in the form of increased prices on foreign imports due to putting high tariffs on those foreign imports—imports which constitute the vast majority of, for example, non-food Wal-Mart products

A willingness to add another 7.5 trillion dollars or possibly even 15.5 trillion to the national debt through 2035—after having watched Trump increase the debt from 20 trillion to 28 trillion in his four-year term despite claiming in his first run for office that he would eliminate the debt over eight years

An embrace of a man so ignorant of basic science that he recommended injecting bleach to fight covid

Comfort with U. S. military personnel being referred to as “suckers” and “losers”—the latter term including those who died in the line of duty

An embrace of the use of violence to steal elections (as long as those doing the stealing are on your side)

Being comfortable with denigrating all immigrants, including legal immigrants, as criminals, typically calling them rapists and murderers, despite the fact that two of his wives have been immigrants

Acceptance of a president with no discernible religious or moral values calling himself and called by others as God’s “chosen one”

Acceptance of a president who exploits the religious values of his base for his own political ends

For Christians, a willingness to put Trump and his nihilism above everything we know about the values of Jesus

Being comfortable with having the first convicted criminal as president, a man determined by one jury to have committed sexual assault and another to have committed 34 felonies to hide a sexual encounter

Being comfortable with a president charged with having stolen various national security documents and with a Supreme Court effectively delaying his trial—and if he wins re-election, being satisfied with allowing the charges and two separate trials to disappear

Satisfaction with a president who has been called “dangerous” and “unfit for office” (and worse) by at least half a dozen of his own former high-ranking inner circle, at least two of whom have called him a fascist

Acceptance of a president who has used the Bible and Arlington National Cemetery as political props

Comfort with a president so crude, dishonest, ignorant, and conceited that if you worked with such a person at your place of employment you would despise him and possibly report him to security

Satisfaction with a mercurial president, one seemingly incapable of rising above his emotions and so lacking in rational thought and judgment having the nuclear codes at his fingertips

Being OK with the Oval Office’s only known draft dodger (by paying a doctor to say he had bone spurs) again being president and Commander-in-Chief

Satisfaction with a professed skeptic of the world’s greatest military alliance and defender of democracy, NATO, being Commander-in-Chief

Being comfortable with a president who could only name authoritarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban of Hungary as a European leader who liked or respected him

Being comfortable with a president who instigated an attempted violent coup against the United States after losing the last election

Agreement with a president claiming that anytime or anything he loses—election or trial—is by definition “rigged,” thus turning the nation into a non-democratic banana republic

Being comfortable with a president so profoundly thin-skinned that anyone who criticizes him is an “enemy of the people” or “the enemy within”

Being OK with a man who stiffed many of his workers and contractors before he became president—then challenging them to sue him—becoming the leader of the country again

Satisfaction with a candidate whose two primary goals as president are “retribution” and dismissing pending trials that could send him to prison

Being just fine with a president who considers himself entitled to grope women because he is famous

Being fiercely critical of Biden’s mental decline and calling him unfit, but not being disturbed at all by the gibberish and frequent incoherence of the man who would become the oldest in history to occupy the Oval Office

These are just some of the things, Trump supporters, you are OK with concerning the possible next occupant of the White House. Of course you will blithely claim there are some minor peccadilloes of Trump you are not comfortable with; but ultimately, when you fill in the Trump-Vance bubble on election day, apparently you really are.

Even More So Now

It has become a political cliché to state that any particular election is critical to the history of the country, and it’s true, they all are. But this one really is unique. This is not merely a choice between two contending political persuasions, two visions of America’s future, two individuals of differing ideology but both within the elastic bounds of political competence. Trump, unlike any of his Republican predecessors running for president, is an amoral self-seeker of fundamentally despotic temperament, a crude misogynist, a liar exceeding anything we have seen in decades, a demagogue oblivious to and dismissive of inconvenient facts, a purveyor of conspiratorial innuendo, and a mercurial bully far too uninformed and narcissistic to wield the power of the presidency. I have compared him to Kim Jong-Un, ruler of North Korea, except that as president Trump would have a Constitution, a congress, and a free press to at least partially clip his wings. And so, to the “undecideds,” you cannot congratulate yourselves for your high principles by sitting this one out. If you have to hold your nose while voting for Kamala, fine, do it. And then—but only if you vote for her—if she does something you don’t like, complain at will.

(This was the final paragraph of “A Pox on Both Your Houses? No” posted on August 14, 2016, when Hillary Clinton was running against Trump. I have changed only two things: Bernie-or-busters is now to the undecideds, and Hillary is now Kamala.)

National Character

Our democracy and our role as leader of the democratic world are in peril. This coming election, unlike those of not-too-distant memory, is not one between mere policies or parties—or even the fervid cultural divisions that so plague us. It is not even just between contempt for military service and respect for it, between gibbering nonsense and rationality, between infantile name-calling and actual seriousness. No, it is something much greater. It is a contest between the gift of a constitutional democracy our Founders bequeathed to us and those who wish to tear down and burn that gift for their own ends. Knowing what we now know, seeing what we have now seen, this election, more than any other since a civil war cleaved us in two, will be our ultimate test of national character. Passing that test is not at all assured. We have a choice, and whatever we choose, whatever the outcome of this vital contest, that is who we are, that is our national character. As others have noted, the outcome is no longer merely a question of Mr. Trump’s character. It is now a question of ours. We are predominantly either a people whose values are still allied with a core of honor and decency, or we are a people whose values have become allied with a core of rot and sickness. Let us listen to conscience, let us rise to our better selves, let us choose honor and decency. Let us choose this not just for this moment, but for our future and for our children and our children’s children.

(Also posted on Facebook September 23, 2024)